Independence of the federal judiciary and the presence of consensus in society about the need to comply with its rulings are hallmarks of the American political system. Throughout the rest of the world another court does not actually exist, even though close possessing such exclusive power, what has the Supreme Court to allow public debate and public policy. Starting point of the U.S. political system is the individual and his rights. The Constitution established the boundaries of those actions that can be taken by the State. Federal courts have reacted to his role as defender of human rights very seriously, and the work in this area is expanded those rights. For example, despite the fact that the word "privacy" in the Constitution is not mentioned, but the Supreme Court saw the intention to protect the privacy of such provisions as the guarantee against unreasonable searches and guarantee of freedom of communication. Freedom of speech has been interpreted by the Supreme Court as a concept, extending not only to television and the Internet, but also to non-verbal forms of communication such as artistic image and the use of political symbols. After all, democracy is the protection of individual rights. Providing this protection and is the main task of the judiciary.U.S. courts may have much to share: they have a long history of independence, development law, and extensive experience managing large and diverse judiciary. Lawyers who come to the U.S. courts of less developed countries often remark deeply rooted in the United States the tradition of judicial independence and the many practical and physical benefits that it attaches to the work of a judge. One of the great advantages enjoyed by federal judges in the U.S. is a life term to protect them from political whims and worries. U.S. courts are also well endowed as the disposal of judge’s new buildings, the extensive use of automation, administrative offices and support staff, significantly facilitating judicial work.
No comments:
Post a Comment